Vizag's black nightmare
VIZAG'S BLACK NIGHTMARE
Talk to anyone in Vizag and the single most
irritating thing about living here is the ubiquitous coal dust pollution. This fine
black powdery substance rises silently, like a ghost, from the port area and
spreads its dark tentacles all over our city. It affects all of Vizag, from the
densely populated old town in the South to the upmarket areas in the North of
Vizag. As homes are swept each morning one can see the black powder accumulating
on the floor at the end of the broom and our laundry on the clothes line is
streaked brown by the time it dries. It settles on our cars and bikes and on
our skin as we drive near the port area. Much of this pernicious dust gives us
itchy eyes, allergic sniffles and most seriously finds its way into our lungs making
us susceptible to respiratory infection and worse.
Historic
problem
Vizag’s citizens have suffered due to this
dirty cargo for years, they have complained, protested, objected, opposed, moaned,
groaned and litigated for decades and yet things have not improved. We are
paying the price for cohabiting with a dirty neighbour the Visakhapatnam Port
Trust (VPT). Is there a solution to the problem? The current VPT chairman
considered an intelligent leader and his executives at the port trust certainly
know what to do. VPT has taken up several established procedures like spraying
the coal heaps with water, covering the heaps with tarpaulin and building a
wall around the stock yards. But that isn’t helping because the heaps are too
high to be sprayed effectively, the tarps are too small to cover the heaps entirely
and the walls are too low to stop the wind from blowing away the covers. What
more can be done? Let us examine the issues and try to home in on the crux of
the problem.
Coal imports
Coal is used mainly for power generation and
for manufacture of steel. Despite having 306 billion tons of coal at our mines and
123 billion tonnes of proven reserves, enough for a hundred years, we still
import around 180 million metric tonnes (mmt) of the stuff every year. That is because
until recently, we were doing a sloppy job of mining and transporting the coal
and our indigenous coal isn’t good enough and has to be blended with better
imported coal. VPT handled around 16 mmt of coking, steam and thermal coal last
year. This coal was meant to arrive at our port and be promptly sent off to the
users by train. But this is not happening
Mechanical
handling of coal
A few years ago VPT realized that the best way
to reduce dust pollution was to mechanize the unloading and despatching
operations. They made a deal with two major private players to set up sophisticated
mechanical facilities in the outer harbour to handle bulk coal for big end
users. Vedanta set up facilities for 10.2 mmt in December 2012 and Adani for 6.45
mmt in September 2014 under a Design, Build, Finance, Operate, and Transfer
(DBFOT) arrangement. Apparently they now
unload ships using large rotary shovels; load the coal on conveyor belts which then
carry the stuff to the rail head, here it is loaded into rail rakes for
despatch to the end users. They were not permitted to handle the coal manually or
transport it by road. Yet these terminals transport portions of coal by road to
the rail head. The AP Pollution Control Board made it obligatory for these
terminals to have a coal dust monitoring system to ensure that their dust
generation was within specified limits but inexplicably these monitors have
still not been installed.
Independent coal
traders
Around that time, because of strong demand, independent
coal traders began importing coal for sale to other users. The coal typically arrived
in “Panamax” vessels with draught (the vertical distance between
the waterline and the bottom of the hull) of 14.5 meters. At that
time the channel leading in and out of our inner coal jetty could not take
these vessels as the draft was inadequate. The port then decided to dredge the
channel to deepen it. As it would take a year or so to do that the traders
requested that they be allowed to offload part of the cargo at the outer
harbour to reduce the draught of the vessel so that it could negotiate the
channel to the inner harbour coal jetty. With this precedence even the new
terminals were embolden to transport part of their coal by road.
Giant
storage yard
Paradoxically while Vedanta and Adani, who
invested Rs. 650 crores and Rs. 350 crores to build a total capacity of around
16 mmt, were told to shun manual handling, the coal traders were permitted to do
just that. In addition they are allowed keep the coal temporarily in the outer
harbour terminal from where trucks moved the coal by road, spewing dust along
the way, to yards in the port area for storage at dirt cheap rates. The traders
and the users benefit from this arrangement because the trader can stock the
coal at little additional cost and the user need not pay for the coal till they
pick it up. In effect the port started acting like a giant storage yard for
coal.
Heaps of
trouble
Shortage of rakes to evacuate the stored coal
was a major issue so starting from allowing free storage for 10 days the port now
allowed storage up to 8 weeks. Some of the coal was stored near densely
populated residential areas and that exacerbated the problem. As Confucius says
“big coal heap make your white underwear
grey and your lung black like soya bean sauce”. It is obvious that the more coal we store the
more dust we will generate. So we arrive at the root of the problem, it’s all
about the storage. If the port really cares for the city and its citizens it
can discourage storage of coal anywhere in the port area. Modern businesses all
over the world follow a JIT (Just in Time) policy. Why should we be penalized
because a steel mill in Orissa keeps their coal at our doorstep for their
convenience while blackening our fair city?
Fifty shades
of grey
In the meanwhile the VPT have completed the
deepening of the channel and it can now take the fully laden Panamax vessels.
Technically there is now no reason for the coal trade to offload part of the
coal at the outer harbour and for the mechanised terminals to transport coal by
road at all. In fact the mechanised coal handling facilities still have spare capacity
to handle all incoming coal in a clean way. But smaller operators and
stevedores, those that have been handling coal manually for years, will face
loss of business and their workers may lose livelihood. This is therefore a
human problem as much as a technical and commercial one. If workers can be
employed elsewhere in the logistics chain the port can dispense with the dirty
business of manually handling, truck transportation and open storage of coal. Can
we satisfy our smart city aspirations by cleaning up our act? There are obviously
shades of grey to consider but black seems to have the upper hand now.
Comments